Posibilitățile de utilizare a materialului bio-hpp în protetica dentară
Cuvinte cheie:
BioHPP, biomateriale, PEEKmodificat, polieter eter cetonă cristalină, umpluturi ceramice, proteze dentare, elasticitate, rigiditate, încărcare imediatăRezumat
Având în vedere preocupările estetice, restaurările fără metal câștigă popularitate în terapiile dentare actuale. BioHPP este un astfel de material care a fost introdus recent în domeniul protezării dentare. Este un material cu proprietăți mecanice și electrice bune, cum ar fi rezistența la temperaturi ridicate și rezistența la hidroliză. Datorită biocompatibilității sale înalte, utilizarea acestui material a crescut în cazurile de ortopedie și traumatologie. Cea mai caracteristică proprietate a materialului PEEK este că are un modul de elasticitate scăzut, apropiat de cel al osului, ceea ce sugerează că prezintă o bună amortizare a șocurilor și rezistență la rupere.
Referințe
1. Heboyan A., Zafar M. S., Rokaya D., Khurshid Z. Insights and Advancements in Biomaterials for Prosthodontics and Implant Dentistry. Molecules. https://doi.org/10.3390/molecules27165116
2. Alexakou E., Damanaki M., Zoidis P., Bakiri E., Mouzis N., Smidt G., Kourtis S. PEEK high performance polymers: A review of properties and clinical applications in prosthodontics and restorative dentistry. European Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2019;27:113-121. https://doi.org/10.1922/EJPRD_01892Zoidis09
3. Paratelli A., Perrone G., Ortega R., Gómez-Polo M. Polyetheretherketone in implant prosthodontics: A scoping review. International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2020;33(6):671-679. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.6649
4. Seferis J. C. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK): processing-structure and properties studies for a matrix in high performance composites. Polymer Composites. 1986;7:158-169. https://doi.org/10.1002/pc.750070305
5. Kurtz S. M., Devine J. N. PEEK biomaterials in trauma, orthopedic, and spinal implants. Biomaterials. 2007;28(32):4845-4869. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.07.013
6. Elsayed A., Farrag G., Chaar M. S., Abdelnabi N., Kern M. Influence of different CAD/CAM crown materials on the fracture of custom-made titanium and zirconia implant abutments after artificial aging. The International Journal of Prosthodontics. 2019;32(1):1-96. https://doi.org/10.11607/ijp.6137
7. Ortega-Martínez J., Farré-Lladós M., Cano-Batalla J., Cabratosa-Termes J. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) as a medical and dental material. A literature review. Medical Research Archives. 2017;5(4). https://doi.org/10.18103/mra.v5i4.1209
8. Najeeb S., Zafar M. S., Khurshid Z., Siddiqui F. Applications of polyetheretherketone (PEEK) in oral implantology and prosthodontics. Journal of Prosthodontic Research. 2016;60(1):12-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpor.2015.10.001
9. Mohan S. et al. Biopolymers - Application in nanoscience and nanotechnology. In: Recent Advances in Biopolymers. 2016:47-72. https://doi.org/10.5772/62225
10. Bechir E. S., Bechir A., Gioga C., Manu R., Burcea A., Dascalu I. T. The advantages of BioHPP polymer as superstructure material in oral implantology. Materiale Plastice. 2016;53(3):394-398.
11. Adler S., Kistler S., Kistler F., Lermer J., Neugebauer J. Compression-moulding rather than milling: A wealth of possible applications for high performance polymers. Quintessenz Zahntechnik. 2013;39:376-384.
12. Costa-Palau S., Torrents-Nicolas J., Brufau-de Barberà M., Cabratosa-Termes J. Use of polyetheretherketone in the fabrication of a maxillary obturator prosthesis: A clinical report. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2014;112(3):680-682. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.10.026
13. Skirbutis G., Dzingutė A., Masiliūnaitė V., Šulcaitė G., Žilinskas J. A review of PEEK polymer's properties and its use in prosthodontics. Stomatologija. 2017;19:19-23.
14. Wagner C., Stock V., Merk S., Schmidlin P. R., Roos M., Eichberger M. et al. Retention load of telescopic crowns with different taper angles between cobalt-chromium and polyetheretherketone made with three different manufacturing processes examined by pull-off test. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2018;27(2):162-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12482
15. Rzanny A., Gobel F., Fachet M. BioHPP Summary of Results for Material Tests. Research Report. Jena, Germany: University of Jena, Department of Materials and Technology; 2013.
16. Wagner C., Stock V., Merk S., Schmidlin P. R., Roos M., Eichberger M. et al. Retention load of telescopic crowns with different taper angles between cobalt-chromium and polyetheretherketone made with three different manufacturing processes examined by pull-off test. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2018;27(2):162-168. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12482
17. Koutouzis T., Richardson J., Lundgren T. Comparative soft and hard tissue responses to titanium and polymer healing abutments. Journal of Oral Implantology. 2011;37 Spec No:174-182. https://doi.org/10.1563/AAID-JOI-D-09-00102.1
18. Zoidis P. Polyetheretherketone overlay prosthesis over high noble ball attachments to overcome base metal sensitivity: A clinical report. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2018;27(8):688-693. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12747
19. Mohamed T., Baraka O. A., Badawy M. M. Comparison between acetal resin and cobalt chromium removable partial denture clasps: Effect on abutment teeth supporting structures. International Journal of Prosthodontics and Restorative Dentistry. 2011;1(3):147-154. https://doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10019-1028
20. Nazari V., Ghodsi S., Alikhasi M., Sahebi M., Shamshiri A. R. Fracture strength of three-unit implant-supported fixed partial dentures with excessive crown height fabricated from different materials. Journal of Dentistry, Tehran. 2016;13(6):400-406.
21. Andrikopoulou E., Zoidis P., Artopoulou I. I., Doukoudakis A. Modified PEEK resin bonded fixed dental prosthesis for a young cleft lip and palate patient. Journal of Esthetic and Restorative Dentistry. 2016;28:201-207. https://doi.org/10.1111/jerd.12221
22. Zoidis P., Bakiri E., Polyzois G. Using a modified PEEK as an alternative material for endocrown restorations: A short-term clinical report. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2017;117:335-337. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.08.009
23. Zoidis P., Papathanasiou I. Modified PEEK resin-bonded fixed dental prosthesis as an interim restoration after implant placement. Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. 2016;116(5):637-641. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.prosdent.2016.04.024
24. Al-Rabab'ah M., Hamadneh W., Alsalem I., Khraisat A., Karaky A. A. Use of high performance polymers as dental implant abutments and frameworks: A case series report. Journal of Prosthodontics. 2019;28(4):365-372. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopr.12639
25. Hossam M., Elshahawy W., Masoud G. E. Evaluation of marginal adaptation and fracture resistance of BioHPP and zirconia. Egyptian Dental Journal. 2018;64(3):1489-1501.
26. Al Assar R. M., Al Yasky M. A., Mandour M. H., Amin R. A. Fracture resistance and retention of metal-free inlay retained fixed partial dentures. Al-Azhar Dental Journal for Girls. 2017;4(4):395-407. https://doi.org/10.21608/adjg.2017.5287
27. Georgiev J., Vlahova A., Kissov H., Aleksandrov S., Kazakova R. Possible application of BioHPP in prosthetic dentistry: A literature review. Journal of IMAB. 2018;24(1):1896-1898. https://doi.org/10.5272/jimab.2018241.1896
Descărcări
Publicat
Număr
Secțiune
Licență
Această lucrare este licențiată în temeiul Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
